Why Did Neal Rauhauser Lie?

Posted on Comments

Because the previous post strung out to 1,500 words — highlighting Neal Rauhauser’s role in the harassment of Mike Stack — I neglected to ask an important question about Rauhauser’s June 2, 2011, “Stranded Wind” post at Daily Kos: Why did Neal tell this lie?

Congressman Anthony Weiner was stalked, set up, smeared, and this was coordinated to protect Clarence Thomas from scrutiny.

You see that this is 18 words of pure, deliberate falsehood.

Neal Rauhauser tells lies like that habitually and routinely. This is just one randomly selected lie among thousands, but look at it again:

Congressman Anthony Weiner was stalked, set up, smeared, and this was coordinated to protect Clarence Thomas from scrutiny.

What could possibly be Rauhauser’s motive for telling that lie? I mean, we now know conclusively that Weiner was never “stalked,” “set up,” and “smeared,” right? Anthony Weiner was guilty, guilty, guilty.

Neal Rauhauser knew this, too. He is not stupid. He knew very well that Weiner sent the Tweets that Weiner was accused of sending.

There was no “set up.” There was no “smear.”

Neal just lied and made that up, but look at the second half of his lie:

. . . this was coordinated to protect Clarence Thomas from scrutiny.

“Coordinated”? By whom did Rauhauser say this was “coordinated“?

We see a steady flow of similar crimes – illegal taping, attempts to tap a Senator’s phone, now intrusion into a Congressman’s social media profiles, and the one thing in common? Andrew Breitbart, who is operating a continuing criminal enterprise as defined by the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act aka RICO.
And now this gang, this conservative media mafia, has done a hit on a U.S. Congressman, and it’s one carefully timed to protect corrupt Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas from scrutiny, and the timing of the delivery was flawless.

This is obviously false, and obviously Neal Rauhauser knew it was false. The “timing” of when Anthony Weiner tweeted that photo of his bulging crotch was entirely up to Anthony Weiner, and so Neal Rauhauser’s deliberate falsehood is preposterous. Yet there it is:

“Andrew Breitbart . . . is operating a continuing criminal
enterprise . . . [which] has done a hit on a U.S. Congressman
. . . carefully timed to protect corrupt Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas from scrutiny.”

This is a lie, and the question is: Why?

No one has ever backed Neal Rauhauser into a corner and demanded that he answer for all the lies he told about WeinerGate, I have focused here on exactly one of those lies, for a reason: It was in that June 2, 2011, post that Rauhauser threatened Mike Stack.

Three weeks later, Mike Stack was SWATted.

A week after that, Patrick “Patterico” Frey was SWATted.

What do Mike Stack and Patrick Frey have in common?

Neal Rauhauser hates their guts.

Somebody needs to ask Neal Rauhauser a few questions.

 

33 comments

  1. Neal has been receiving royalties from the land he sold to Frakkers. It has allowed him to live in basements and pal around (cyberly speaking) with alleged pedophiles like Kimberlin. That’s right, Rauhauser sold out to Frakkers and the proceeds enable him to promote the causes of Kimberlin, who blew a guy’s legs off and allegedly statutorily raped a girl for a year or so. At least allegedly. Although the frakking records are available for those who want to look. I wonder if thousands in back child support that Neal hasn’t paid could be paid with his Frakking royalties?

  4. Maybe this is a little window into how these sorts of things get going. For instance, where did the idea originate that Benghazi was because of some video no one ever saw? Down deep in the bowels of where people who fancy themselves “political operatives” in Dem politics dwell, these crazy little fictions and memes get incubated, in the hopes they catch currency. And, hey, as we’ve seen, sometimes they do. Neal’s one of those, or a wannabe. His Weiner lie was crazy, but sometimes even crazy works or is useful in some other way. It does make one wonder if there are other little cells of Dem Party political ratfuckers out there as odious as this coven of ex-felons, pervs, sociopaths, and card-carrying psychos.

  5. Good question. Next time I see him, I’ll ask him. Over and over and over and over and over again. Until he answers me. Which he never will. So I’ll just keep asking. I also think I’ll ask him about all that money he’s making on that fracking and why he hasn’t used it pay his child support.

  8. Has anyone been able to contact Nebraska about his fracking income? I have no problem with fracking but I have a real problem with non-payment of child supprt.

  9. Pointing out the lies spewed by Neal Rauhauser is like pointing a flashlight straight into the eyes of a rat hiding in a darkened room.

    Keep up the good work, Stacy.

  12. I was thinking about that as well. Has he even filed tax returns in the last…5 years? I’m betting that income was never declared.

Comments are closed.